"Math" "eduction"
It's a scathing indictment of "math" eduction, pretty much from top to bottom. I am basically agree, with the same reservations as Scott Aaronson. Go read the critique and the whole damn essay (yes, it's 25 pages long).
The essay also makes a point that I have tried -- much more clumsily -- to make many times.
One reason people cannot fathom mathematics as an interesting subject is that they have never had a math class. They have have more and more complicated arithmetic classes. And math is not arithmetic. Arithmetic is basically accounting. No one thinks accounting is interesting. Especially mathematicians.
It is unfortunate that in an average curriculum, math is hidden away until you are beyond your calculus/ODE sequence of classes.
PS: I used to say this sort of this when I was being a stuck-up little snot about "real" math, etc. But I don't mean it that way at all. It's not about "higher", or "pure" math, or it being somehow more "advanced." I've been humbled many times since then. I mean it in the same sense as the original essay.
